โ† Back to Portfolio
Hero Background

Seoul Network Behaviorology

Architectural Design, Architectural Theory, 2019

Seoul Network Behaviorology

Architectural Design
Architectural Theory
2019
Workshop in Tokyo
Size : 1000 * 700 * 1700 (mm)
          40 * 27.5 * 67 (inch)

Rhino, Grasshopper, Adobe Creative, AutoCAD

This project explores the behavioral dynamics of Seoul citizens in a networked society and visualizes their spatial synergies. By randomly placing five major districts and mapping peopleโ€™s movements, it transforms urban interactions into a three-dimensional system. The work highlights how individuals create space through activity and communication, suggesting that cities are fluid structures shaped by time, relationships, and personal agency. The model reflects Seoulโ€™s layered complexity through a responsive and diversified urban infrastructure.

Image 2 Image 3 Image 4 Image 5 Image 6 Image 7

Starting with modeling a room in Seoul, we visualized spatial flows of 15 individuals, revealing the complex yet organic relationships in urban life.

Image 8 Image 9
Image 10
Wide Graphic Tall Diagram
Wide Graphic Tall Diagram
img14 img15 img16
img18 img19 img20
Image 1 Image 2 Image 3 Image 4 Image 5 Image 6 Image 7 Image 8

A City Woven by Relations


his model illustrates the city as a living organism shaped by relationships and events rather than fixed forms. 3D-printed cell-like modules and organic curves rise within a rigid wooden frame, forming multi-layered structures. Threads interconnect spaces, symbolizing flows of data and human interaction. Each unit reflects an individualโ€™s presence or activity, while collectively they operate as a networked system. Varying densities across the structure respond to diverse social behaviors, suggesting that cities evolve through interaction. In contrast to the rigid periphery, this model presents a decentralized vision of future urbanism.

Do we shape space, or does space shape us?

This project sees the city not as a static object but as a network of relationships and events. It highlights the dual nature of spaceโ€”formed by human activity while simultaneously shaping human behavior. So the fundamental question arises: is space merely something we design and organize, or is it an active agent that configures the way we live and connect?